Florida's Proposed First-In-Nation Water Excise Tax Bottled Up By Legal - Procedural Questions
Posted January 22, 2020 06:05 am
									
TALLAHASSEE, FL – 
									
									A proposal to impose a first-in-the-nation 
									excise tax on companies extracting water 
									from Florida aquifers was postponed Tuesday 
									to resolve constitutionality questions and 
									address industry objections.
									
									Sen. Anne Taddeo’s Senate Bill 1112 Tuesday 
									survived an attempt before the Senate 
									Commerce & Tourism Committee to replace the 
									tax with penalties, but could not advance 
									without clarifying if it needs a two-thirds 
									vote in both chambers and violates the 1972 
									Florida Water Resources Act, which declares 
									springs, rivers and lakes state property but 
									does not have a provision for setting a 
									price on its extracted value.
									
									“We have a lot of work to do,” Taddeo, 
									D-Miami, said. “This is a conversation we 
									absolutely need to have.”
									
									SB 1112 would slap a 12.5 cent per gallon 
									tax on extracted water with revenues 
									dedicated to the state’s Wastewater 
									Treatment & Stormwater Management Revolving 
									Loan Trust Fund.
									
									Taddeo said state water policies, unchanged 
									since the 1990s, are exploited by 
									corporations “making a tremendous amount of 
									money” while paying as little as $115 for 
									consumptive use permits (CUPs) granted by 
									the state’s five water management districts.
									
									“Our state imposes extraction taxes on oil, 
									gas and other minerals but we do not impose 
									taxes on our most valuable, precious 
									resource – water,” she said. “Water is 
									Florida’s oil.”
									
									Committee chair Sen. Joe Gruters, 
									R-Sarasota, the state GOP chair, called the 
									12.5 cent per gallon levy “a massive tax 
									increase” and proposed replacing it with a 
									12.5 cent penalty per gallon above amounts 
									allowed in CUPs.
									
									Gruters said SB 1112 was “probably good 
									public policy” but a tax is “going to be 
									very tough” to approve.
									
									“This bill will fundamentally change Florida 
									law. It would be the first of its kind in 
									the United States to impose a fee on 
									extracted water,” he said.
									
									Gruters’ amendment failed, but panel members 
									acknowledged concern about the measure’s 
									legality in meeting the one-topic 
									requirement, among other issues.
									
									The bill is supported by environmental 
									interests, including Sierra Club Florida and 
									the Florida Springs Council.
									
									“This bill provides a market mechanism to 
									protect against over-use,” Sierra Club 
									Florida’s Dave Cullen said, calling for a 
									CUP moratorium until regulations are updated
									
									Florida Springs Council’s Ryan Smart said 
									state waters “are already significantly 
									overdrawn. There is no evidence of exceeding 
									(CUPs) because the permit system isn’t 
									working.”
									
									The bill is opposed by business groups, 
									including Associated Industries of Florida 
									and Nestlé Waters North America.
									
									Nestlé has contracted with Seven Springs 
									Water Co., which has a pending five-year 
									permit renewal before the Suwannee River 
									Water Management District to extract 1 
									million gallons daily from Ginnie Springs.
									
									Nestlé spokesman Lane Stevens said “contrary 
									to social medial speculation, 95 percent of 
									the water bottled in Florida is sold and 
									used in Florida.”
									
									He said Nestlé employs more than 920 
									Floridians with an annual payroll of $52 
									million and pays $7 million in taxes to 
									local governments.
									
									“No other state in the country has concluded 
									it is in that state’s best interest to tax 
									water. If adopted, water production will 
									shift out of Florida,” Stevens said, noting 
									Nestlé would pay more in taxes than in 
									wages. “I don’t think there is any other 
									business in Florida that pays more in taxes 
									than its payroll.”
									
									Taddeo’s bill is among a bevy of proposed 
									water-extraction legislation, including a 
									House companion, House Bill 861, filed by 
									Rep. Matt Willhite, D-Wellington; SB 1798, 
									filed by Sen. Rob Bradley, R-Fleming Island, 
									to require a specified fee for CUPs granted 
									to water bottlers; and SBs 1096 and 1098, 
									filed by Sen. Janet Cruz, D-Tampa, requiring 
									CUPs be state-monitored and levy a 5 cent 
									per gallon surcharge.
-------------------------------
This piece appeared in the The Center Square and was reprinted by the Columbia County Observer with permission or license.
Layout and graphics added by the Observer

By 
									John Haughey | The Center Square